FIGHT LAWS THAT ALLOW THEM TO OPERATE THEIR SCAMS
In the past couple of decades, Australian state governments have needed to raise more revenue to fund their various projects and also to fill their coffers in order to pork-barrel upcoming election campaigns.
They have discovered that motorists make excellent targets for this gouging by claiming that their enforcement methods are all about road safety. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Police hiding behind bushes with speed guns instead of being on the roads deterring stupid driving is not helping road safety. Speed and red light cameras that cannot prevent – and actually increase accidents – degrade road safety and put the lives of citizens at risk.
To make the revenue-raising scams work, state governments have passed what amount to pretend laws that violate the civil and legal rights of citizens.
These governments operate on the basis that the people do not know their unalienable and legal rights and are too intimidated to oppose them.
To this end, governments have rigged the court systems by making the cost of contesting penalties far more expensive for people than paying the penalties.
So between the pretend laws that scare motorists into abrogating their rights and the rigged court systems, state governments have been fleecing motorists for a long time and this scam needs to be stopped.
FUNDAMENTAL UNALIENABLE AND LEGAL RIGHTS OF PEOPLE
Under Australia’s constitutional and legal system, every person has a number of Unalienable and legal rights that cannot be violated by any state or even commonwealth law.
THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE – You are INNOCENT until proven guilty in a court of competent jurisdiction.
THE RIGHT TO SILENCE –You cannot be compelled to say anything or cooperate with the state or police.
RIGHT TO REFUSE TO PROVIDE ANYTHING THAT MAY TEND TO INCRIMINATE THEM – You cannot be compelled to provide anything that may tend to incriminate you.
So these rights are fundamental and in theory, cannot be denied or violated.
However all Australian state governments have passed pretend laws otherwise known as colour of law that have done exactly that, because these pretend laws are literally the only way that state governments can continue to perpetrate their revenue-raising scams by gouging motorists and using false pretexts of road safety to justify them.
HIGH COURT RULES ON UNLAWFUL USE OF EVIDENCE
In the famous case of Lee vs The Queen, the highest court in the land made the following ruling:
It is a breach of the principle of the common law, and a departure in a fundamental respect from a criminal trial which the system of criminal justice requires an accused person to have, for the prosecution to be armed with the evidence of an accused person obtained under compulsion concerning matters the subject of the charges.
Lee v The Queen [2014] High Court of Australia (21 May 2014)
When people are being prosecuted in NSW, they are now expected to show their defence to the prosecution, which is as crazy as it sounds. For instance, if a police officer “verbals” a person by accusing them of not wearing a seat belt or holding a mobile phone while driving and the defendant has hard evidence, for instance in the form of video from a car black box recorder that the officer was lying, then having to disclose this to the prosecution means that the police officer can be briefed about it and then change his testimony to avoid facing accusations of perjury if he lies about the incident under oath in the witness box.
There is a very long-standing principle of law in Australia that does not compel defendants to aid anybody to prosecute them.
Revealing a defendant’s defence and evidence to a prosecution allows the prosecutor to fiddle with the facts that he would use to run the prosecution and this would be grossly unfair.
Despite the government passing statutes to compel defendants to reveal their hand to the prosecution, nobody should ever do this and instead, should rely on their enshrined legal rights and the High Court ruling in the Lee vs The Queen matter.
WHAT IS A PRETEND LAW?
To facilitate their scams, states have imposed laws that violate the Australian Constitution and the civil and legal rights of people.
They are essentially illegal laws. In the High Court of Australia, the highest court in the land, Justice John Latham stated the following in the precedent-setting Uniform Taxation Case HCA (High Court of Australia) 1942 (65 CLR 373 at 408).
Common expressions such as: ‘The Courts have declared a statute invalid’ sometime lead to misunderstanding.
A pretend law made in excess of power is not and never has been a law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to disregard it.
Naturally, he will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favour, but such a decision is not an element that produces invalidity in any law.
The law is not valid until a court pronounces against it – and thereafter invalid. If it is beyond power it is void ab initio.
A PRETEND LAW MADE IN EXCESS OF POWER IS NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN A LAW AT ALL
Justice John Latham, High Court of Australia, HCA (High Court of Australia) 1942 (65 CLR 373 at 408)
Here was a High Court Justice telling everyone man and woman that “A pretend law made in excess of power is not and never has been a law at all” – it is void ab initio.
All those state laws that try to force an accused person to provide information or make admissions are pretend laws made in excess of power and cannot be sustained.
All those laws that purport to “deem” the owner of a vehicle guilty of an offence without proving this in court beyond reasonable doubt. So all government threats are hollow and they should be totally disregarded.
There is no such thing as “owner onus” in criminal matters, even trivial ones such as traffic offences, therefore the onus is entirely on the prosecution to prove its case against somebody, not a company or any other entity
This trespass against the free people of the Commonwealth of Australia must end .
The AUP have stated many times that the platform is as much yours as anyone elses.
So why not use it to organise as one people to end this trespass ?
Its up to each individual to spread the information about the trespass perpetrated against us and its up to every Australian to be active in the restoration of our true common law jurisdiction.
If we remain divided and silent the trespass against us will continue to grow and the intrusion into all aspects of our lives will only get worse.
We must never forget that mankind created Governments as such mankind is its master not its slave.